Initial commit: retroDE_ps2 — first-of-its-kind PS2 GS FPGA core (DE25-Nano / Agilex 5)

RTL (GS rasterizer, EE core stub, platform bridge, LPDDR4B path), sim regression
(272 TBs), docs, and tooling. Copyrighted PS2 content (BIOS, game code, GS dumps,
and all dump-derived textures/traces) is excluded via .gitignore and stays local.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
2026-06-29 20:10:50 -04:00
commit ec82764bef
2462 changed files with 2174303 additions and 0 deletions
+147
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
# Ch290 closeout — syscall 0x12 HLE; paired syscall 0x16 surfaces with identical args
**Status:** Closed. **Verdict from re-running qbert.elf:**
`elf_first_unhandled_syscall (pc=0x00112A74 $v1=0x16 (=22))` with
arguments **identical to the syscall 0x12 call we just HLE'd**.
qbert advanced 27,930 → **27,950 retires (+20)** through the
handler-install syscall and into a companion call that takes the
exact same args. The strongest signal of the run.
## Codex's framing confirmed
Codex predicted "$v1=0x12 is a registration call, plausibly
AddDmacHandler(5, fn, 0, ctx)". The runner-side observer
captured the first occurrence:
```
syscall_0x12 = seen=1 count=1 first_pc=0x00112a54
$a0=0x05 $a1=0x00112ab0 $a2=0x00000000 $a3=0x001328c0 → $v0=0
```
This is the classic 4-arg handler-install ABI: small slot index +
function pointer + null ctx0 + context pointer.
## The paired-syscall signal
The next blocker after 0x12 is `$v1=0x16 (=22)` at PC 0x00112A74,
**32 bytes (8 instructions) past the 0x12 call site**. Args:
| Reg | After syscall 0x12 | At syscall 0x16 blocker |
|-----|--------------------|-------------------------|
| $a0 | 0x00000005 | **0x00000005** |
| $a1 | 0x00112AB0 | **0x00112AB0** |
| $a2 | 0x00000000 | **0x00000000** |
| $a3 | 0x001328C0 | **0x001328C0** |
**Identical.** qbert is calling syscall 0x16 with the literally
same arguments it just passed to 0x12. The PS2 syscall table cites
`EnableIntcHandler` / `EnableDmacHandler` (or similar
"enable-just-registered" calls) in the 0x14-0x18 range. The
pattern: `Add*Handler` registers, `Enable*Handler` activates.
This is a Ch291 candidate with very high confidence:
- Same Ch285 precedent: accept ($v0 = 0, PC += 4).
- Parallel observer in the runner.
- One more switch case in the dispatcher.
## What landed in Ch290
### Dispatcher case — `rtl/ee/ee_core_stub.sv`
One new case (the 6th overall) in the Ch273 HLE switch:
```sv
32'h0000_0012: begin
regfile[2] <= 32'd0;
gpr128[2] <= 128'd0;
pc <= pc + 32'd4;
retire_pulse <= 1'b1;
state <= S_IFETCH_REQ;
end
```
Per Codex: do NOT invoke the handler function, do NOT mutate
DMAC/INTC state. Just accept the registration and observe what
qbert demands next.
### TB extension — `tb_ee_core_syscall_hle.sv`
Same mechanical pattern (slots / latch / assertion / display) used
for the Ch285 0x40 and Ch289 0x78 extensions. The TB now covers
six known syscall numbers (3C / 3D / 40 / 64 / 78 / 12). Result:
```
$v0_after_3C=0x001e0000 $v0_after_3D=0x00000000 $v0_after_64=0x00000000
$v0_after_40=0x00000000 $v0_after_78=0x00000000 $v0_after_12=0x00000000
$v1_at_halt=0x00007777
```
### Runner-side observer — `tb_ee_core_elf_runner.sv`
Parallel to the Ch289 0x78 observer. Same shape: detect retire of
SYSCALL with $v1 = 0x12, snapshot PC + $a0..$a3 on first occurrence,
emit a SUMMARY line. Worked first try — `syscall_0x12 seen=1
count=1 ...`.
The two observers (0x78 and 0x12) form a small library of "this
HLE'd syscall is worth surfacing." The pattern is mechanical and
the SUMMARY block now self-documents what qbert is calling the
kernel for. As more syscalls accumulate, the SUMMARY becomes a
running ledger of qbert's init sequence.
## qbert progression
| Chapter | Blocker | retire_count |
|---|---|---|
| Post-Ch287 (DMAC ctrl) | unmapped 0x1000C000 | 27,912 |
| Post-Ch288 (DMAC passive) | syscall 0x78 | 27,920 |
| Post-Ch289 (syscall 0x78) | syscall 0x12 | 27,930 |
| **Post-Ch290 (syscall 0x12)** | **syscall 0x16 at PC 0x00112A74 (identical args)** | **27,950 (+20)** |
The +20 retires include the 0x12 syscall return + 8 instructions
of setup (likely loading the same args back into $a0/$a1/$a3 from
some register holding pattern, or just executing the second call
that already had them in place) + the 0x16 syscall trap.
## Ch291 framing — syscall 0x16
Args identical to syscall 0x12 — the pattern Codex predicted at
Ch290 (registration accepted; next demand will tell us if the
handler needs to actually fire). The simplest hypothesis: 0x16 is
`Enable*Handler` for the registration that just landed.
First-pass scope:
1. Add `$v1 == 0x16` case to dispatcher: $v0 = 0, PC += 4.
2. Parallel observer in the runner (same template as 0x78/0x12).
3. TB extension (7th case).
If qbert then goes on to *poll* for the handler to fire — e.g.,
read DMAC D_STAT looking for a channel-5 interrupt bit — then
Ch292 has to model the handler-invocation path (real interrupt
delivery, COP0 Cause/Status, the registered fn_ptr being called).
But based on the identical args + Ch285 precedent, $v0=0 is the
right shape for the first pass. Let qbert's next demand tell us
what's needed.
## Pattern review (20 chapters)
20 chapters in: Ch271 + Ch290 = 12 retires → 27,950 retires
(2,329× advance). The syscall HLE dispatcher now handles SIX
distinct $v1 values, each added in one chapter. The runner-side
observer pattern (Ch289/Ch290) makes the diagnostic free.
## Files changed
- `rtl/ee/ee_core_stub.sv` — one new HLE case (~10 LOC).
- `sim/tb/integration/tb_ee_core_syscall_hle.sv` — extended with
syscall 0x12 case.
- `sim/tb/integration/tb_ee_core_elf_runner.sv` — syscall_0x12
observer + SUMMARY line.
No new TB, no new Makefile target; regression count unchanged at
**175/175**.
## Regression
**175/175 PASS** (unchanged from Ch289; no new TB).