The visible label was right but the contract behind it was not. The clamp lived
in three places — DecisionOffer.callAmount (unclamped, so it still reported the
full amount owed), buttonsFor(), and PokerViewModel — and only the presentation
copy was tested. Three copies of a rule is how the original mismatch happened.
DecisionOffer.callAmount is now minOf(toCall, stack), with callIsAllIn beside
it, and both the label and the submitted action read from it. Nothing recomputes
the clamp.
Engine sanitisation also left an oversized CALL amount unchanged in HandEvent
even though commit() caps the commitment, so history described chips that never
moved. Since replay and the coach both read that history, calls are now recorded
at what was actually committed.
Note the arithmetic: heads-up, seat 1 is the big blind, so with a 40 stack
facing a raise to 100 the call commits the remaining 30, not 40. My first test
asserted 40 and the engine was right.
Verified by reverting: both contract fixes fail their tests.
Tests: 144 -> 150 (67 engine JVM, 67 Android host, 16 app). Simulation figures
unchanged (289.12 / 113.19 / -195.64), chips conserved.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
thejayman77
c0bf57bf8d